THE CHALLENGE
Model Inventories Are
Outgrowing Model Risk Teams
Every new pricing, fraud or GenAI model adds to an inventory that MRM teams struggle to validate and monitor. ML and GenAI also introduce new risks around bias, hallucination and drift.
Anaptyss extends your MRM capacity with trained specialists who work within your existing methodology, keeping validation, tiering and monitoring on track.
Model Risk Capacity That
Scales With Your Inventory
We deliver validation, tiering, monitoring, and reporting integrated with your methodology, templates, systems, and thresholds. Automation handles repeatable evidence and documentation work, while model risk officers retain ownership of opinions and sign-off.
WHAT WE DO
Model Risk Services
We Deliver
Independent
Model ValidationFull-scope review of a model's theory, data, methodology and output, closed out with a validation report and opinion your model risk committee can act on.
Model
Development reviewA conceptual soundness check before a model reaches production. Is the problem definition right, is the design defensible, does the methodology hold up.
Inventory and
TieringBuilding and maintaining the model inventory, drawing clean boundaries between models and end-user tools, and tiering by risk so effort goes where it matters most.
Ongoing Monitoring
and TestingBacktesting, sensitivity analysis and stability checks run on schedule, with breaches routed against your escalation thresholds rather than discovered at the next annual review.
GenAI and ML
OversightBias, hallucination and explainability testing built for models that do not behave like traditional statistical ones, with drift monitoring that catches degradation early.
Post-Model
Adjustment ReviewOverlays and manual adjustments revisited on a set cadence, so a temporary fix does not become permanent without documented justification.
Regulatory and
Policy SupportKeeping your validation standard and MRM policy current, and preparing the file before an examiner asks for it, under SR 11-7, TRIM, SS1/23 or your local equivalent.
Committee and
Board ReportingTurning validation status and open findings into reporting your model risk committee and board can actually use to steer.
Delivered Through Digital Knowledge Operations™
We adopt your MRM methodology, systems and thresholds before validation begins, then extend your team with additional capacity while keeping ownership of model decisions with your organization.
- 01
Integrated MRM
MethodologyMRM policies, tiering logic and templates are built into specialist training, assessment and deployment, and updated as requirements change.
- 02
Continuity Over
RotationThe same validators and reviewer stay on your inventory over time. They get to know your models and business lines well enough that reviews get faster, not just repeated.
- 03
Automation Handles the
Repeatable WorkANA automates structured testing, evidence review and documentation against your validation standard, with an audit trail and human sign-off.
- 04
Retaining Model
Risk OwnershipTesting and findings are documented for your review. Model risk officers retain final opinion and sign-off, with full analysis and evidence records preserved for every file.
Remediation is tracked through completion, so open findings do not roll forward on the inventory.
Evidence gathering and documentation transition to the managed team, allowing validators to focus exclusively on methodology, analysis, and findings.Tiering directs validator time to the models that carry the most exposure.
As ML and GenAI models grow, validation capacity scales with the inventory instead of trailing behind it.New pricing, fraud and GenAI models are validated as they ship, not after.
Documentation built during validation ensures that examinations and reviews rely on an established record, streamlining the audit process.Examiners receive a complete, current file for every model in scope.
- 40%
40% faster validation of third-party credit risk models for a US commercial lender.
- 2500+
2,500+ entity-level controls tested for a US regional bank through an automated testing framework.
- 100%
100% quantification of financial crime model performance for a US bank across accuracy, precision, recall and fairness, bringing the suite into line with its MRM policy.
- USD400,000
USD 400,000 annual savings for a US commercial lender, through a machine learning credit risk scoring model.
Related Insights
BlogModel Ops (MLOps) in Banking – Scaling from 10 to 1000 Models
For the modern financial institution, the challenge is no longer “if” AI should be adopted, but how to…
BlogModel Risk Management for Generative AI in Banks and Financial Institutions
The global financial sector is undergoing a structural transformation driven by rapid advances in…
Blog5 Key Strategies to Effectively Audit Model and AI Risk in Finance
In the modern financial landscape, mathematical models have become the central nervous system of…
BlogManual vs AI-Powered Challenger Model Development in Banking
In the high-stakes world of banking, challenger models serve as a critical check on the primary models…
BlogSR 11-7 Compliance — Best Practices for Model Override Governance and Tracking
In the world of banking, mathematical models are the silent engines driving critical decisions, from…
BlogThe Four Pillars of Effective Prepayment Risk Management for Financial Institutions
Through extensive analysis and collaboration with banking and financial services institutions, Anaptyss…
BlogStress Testing for Crypto-Exposed Portfolios — Methodologies and Regulatory Insights
As cryptocurrencies become more integrated into the financial system, U.S. banks and financial…
See Where Your Model
Inventory Actually Stands
Send us your inventory and validation backlog. We will tell you which models are overdue, which are misclassified and what a managed team would clear first.